<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Disappointed with GMail Labs</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.sgi.nu/diary/2008/06/07/disappointed-with-gmail-labs/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.sgi.nu/diary/2008/06/07/disappointed-with-gmail-labs/</link>
	<description>The musings of a research software engineer ...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Jul 2010 02:50:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Lampert</title>
		<link>http://www.sgi.nu/diary/2008/06/07/disappointed-with-gmail-labs/comment-page-1/#comment-231290</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Lampert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jun 2008 11:16:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sgi.nu/diary/?p=144#comment-231290</guid>
		<description>Not sure. I think GMail is quite well resourced, but I assume it&#039;s all done in small teams. I agree about the &#039;quick wins&#039;. 

According to &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/06/05/gmail-labs-a-public-stage-for-googlers-20-time/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;TechCrunch&lt;/a&gt;, Gmail product manager Keith Coleman says that any Google employee can add their creations once they go through a simple code check. 

So it certainly gives a large and easy to access testing facility for new mail features that might occur to any Google engineer. Of course, Google already has a huge internal testing base for GMail, but that&#039;s obviously a skewed user base compared to the GMail public (at least, I assume it would be). 

Not sure what any huge announcement might be. Clearly they&#039;ll eventually launch features that integrate Open Social and other Google APIs (showing the sender or email hop points on a map or other kitschy geo-features are bound to end up in some developer&#039;s head and turn up at some point). 

Perhaps they&#039;ll integrate a life-scanner interface so we can attach real-world objects as MIME attachments ... who knows? I can only hope there are more interesting ideas coming down the pipeline.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not sure. I think GMail is quite well resourced, but I assume it&#8217;s all done in small teams. I agree about the &#8216;quick wins&#8217;. </p>
<p>According to <a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/06/05/gmail-labs-a-public-stage-for-googlers-20-time/" rel="nofollow">TechCrunch</a>, Gmail product manager Keith Coleman says that any Google employee can add their creations once they go through a simple code check. </p>
<p>So it certainly gives a large and easy to access testing facility for new mail features that might occur to any Google engineer. Of course, Google already has a huge internal testing base for GMail, but that&#8217;s obviously a skewed user base compared to the GMail public (at least, I assume it would be). </p>
<p>Not sure what any huge announcement might be. Clearly they&#8217;ll eventually launch features that integrate Open Social and other Google APIs (showing the sender or email hop points on a map or other kitschy geo-features are bound to end up in some developer&#8217;s head and turn up at some point). </p>
<p>Perhaps they&#8217;ll integrate a life-scanner interface so we can attach real-world objects as MIME attachments &#8230; who knows? I can only hope there are more interesting ideas coming down the pipeline.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: aaron</title>
		<link>http://www.sgi.nu/diary/2008/06/07/disappointed-with-gmail-labs/comment-page-1/#comment-229707</link>
		<dc:creator>aaron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2008 01:11:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sgi.nu/diary/?p=144#comment-229707</guid>
		<description>True, looking at the feature list they have added, it looks like they have chosen the &#039;quick wins&#039;, the easiest to develop. 

So now for the theories, are they working on something huge and it&#039;s to early even for labs or are they not throwing resources at gmail ?

thoughts ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>True, looking at the feature list they have added, it looks like they have chosen the &#8216;quick wins&#8217;, the easiest to develop. </p>
<p>So now for the theories, are they working on something huge and it&#8217;s to early even for labs or are they not throwing resources at gmail ?</p>
<p>thoughts ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Lampert</title>
		<link>http://www.sgi.nu/diary/2008/06/07/disappointed-with-gmail-labs/comment-page-1/#comment-229683</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Lampert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2008 00:19:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sgi.nu/diary/?p=144#comment-229683</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not fixed on particular features, but I&#039;d like to see something a little more significant and innovative than what&#039;s on offer to date. For example, adding in some of the mail-trends/xobni-like data mining would be interesting. 

The ability to play pong in my web-based email app doesn&#039;t really rate highly on that scale for me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not fixed on particular features, but I&#8217;d like to see something a little more significant and innovative than what&#8217;s on offer to date. For example, adding in some of the mail-trends/xobni-like data mining would be interesting. </p>
<p>The ability to play pong in my web-based email app doesn&#8217;t really rate highly on that scale for me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: aaron</title>
		<link>http://www.sgi.nu/diary/2008/06/07/disappointed-with-gmail-labs/comment-page-1/#comment-227847</link>
		<dc:creator>aaron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jun 2008 23:48:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sgi.nu/diary/?p=144#comment-227847</guid>
		<description>what features do you hope or think they should implement ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>what features do you hope or think they should implement ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
